SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!
Sign up for Englemed updates from TwitterSign up for Englemed updates from Facebook
ENGLEMED
Contact Englemed
Our contact email address.
We can provide a specialist, tailored health and medical news service for your site.
Click here for more information
RSS graphic XML Graphic Add to Google
About Englemed news services - services and policies.
Englemed News Blog - Ten years and counting.
Diary of a reluctant allergy sufferer - How the British National Health Service deals with allergy.
BOOKS AND GIFTS THIS WAY!
BookshopFor books on women's health, healthy eating ideas, mental health issues, diabetes, etc click here
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright Notice. All reports, text and layout copyright Englemed Ltd, 52 Perry Avenue, Birmingham UK B42 2NE. Co Registered in England No 7053778 Some photos copyright Englemed Ltd, others may be used with permission of copyright owners.
Disclaimer: Englemed is a news service and does not provide health advice. Advice should be taken from a medical professional or appropriate health professional about any course of treatment or therapy.
FreeDigitalPhotos
www.freedigitalphotos.net
FreeWebPhotos
www.freewebphoto.com
FROM OUR NEWS FEEDS
Gene test proposed following neonatal encephalopathy
Wed August 5th - Gene profiling could predict outcomes for new born babies following oxygen deprivation, as well as help explain the mechanisms causing the damage, British researchers say. More
COVID-19 infection possible in early gestation
Wed August 5th - Genes which allow COVID-19 infection to take hold are present in the first trimester of pregnancy, researchers report today. More
RECENT COMMENTS
On 08/02/2018 David Kelly wrote:
Would you like to write a piece about this to be i... on Researchers unveil new pain re...
On 23/10/2017 Cristina Pereira wrote:
https://epidemicj17.imascientist.org.uk/2017/06/21... on HIV breakthrough - MRC...
On 12/09/2017 Aparna srikantam wrote:
Brilliant finding! indeed a break through in under... on Leprosy research breakthrough...
On 01/07/2017 Annetta wrote:
I have been diagnosed with COPD for over 12 years.... on Seaweed plan for antimicrobial...
On 12/03/2017 Steph wrote:
The photo you have paired with this article is its... on 'Fat shaming' limits...
OUR CLIENTS
THIS WEEK'S STORIES
ENGLEMED HEALTH NEWS

'Major weaknesses' in COVID-19 antibody tests

Thursday July 2nd 2020

The COVID-19 antibody tests have major weaknesses, according to a review of the latest international research published today.

The findings emerged as further evidence emerged of local resurgences of the virus in the UK following the lockdown of the city of Leicester.

A global team of researchers searched medical databases and preprint servers from 1 January to 30 April 2020 for studies that measured sensitivity and/or specificity of a COVID-19 antibody test compared with a control test.

They found eligible studies, 70% of which were from China, with the rest from the UK, USA, Denmark, Spain, Sweden, Japan and Germany.

However, half of the studies were not peer reviewed and most had a high or unclear risk of bias. Four studies included outpatients and two evaluated tests at the point of care.

Writing in The BMJ, the authors say that when they pooled together the sensitivity results for each study, they ranged between 66% and 97.8%, depending on the type of test method used.

They also found that pooled specificities ranged from 96.6% to 99.7%, depending on the test method used, which meant that up to 3.4% of patients were wrongly identified as having COVID-19.

The authors also reveal that pooled sensitivities were consistently lower for the lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) test – the method that is being considered for “immunity passports” – compared with other test methods.

They warn that based on their results, if an LFIA test is applied to a population with a COVID-19 prevalence of 10%, for every 1000 people tested, 31 who never had the virus will be incorrectly told they are immune, while 34 people who had it will be incorrectly told that they were never infected.

The research also highlighted concerns over commercial test kits, which had 65% sensitivity compared with 88.2% of non-commercial kits.

“These observations indicate important weaknesses in the evidence on COVID-19 serological tests, particularly those being marketed as point-of-care tests,” they write.

“While the scientific community should be lauded for the pace at which novel serological tests have been developed, this review underscores the need for high quality clinical studies to evaluate these tools. With international collaboration, such studies could be rapidly conducted."

* East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust accounted for 8% of deaths from the virus in one week last month, it was revealed. The 23 deaths accounted for two-thirds of the fatalities in the south-east of England that week, the Health Service Journal reported.

Leaks from Public Health England, meanwhile, point to rising numbers of cases in Barnsley, Oldham, Rochdale, Bradford and Bedford with potential for local lockdowns in each case.

The UK reported 829 new cases and 176 new deaths from the virus yesterday. The USA reported more than 50,000 new cases and 668 deaths - and Brazil more than 44,000 cases and 1,057 deaths.

Lisboa Bastos M, Tavaziva G. Kunal Abidi S, Campbell JR, Haraoui L-P, Jonston JC, Lan Z, Law S, MacLean E, Trajman A, Menzie D, Benedetti A, Ahmad Khan F. Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2 July 2020

https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m2516

Tags: Asia | Europe | Flu & Viruses | North America | UK News | World Health

Printer friendly page Printer friendly page

Comment on this article:

Name:
Email:
Comment:
<a>,<b> & <p> tags allowed
Please enter the letters displayed:
(not case sensitive)
CATEGORIES