Sign up for Englemed updates from TwitterSign up for Englemed updates from Facebook
Contact Englemed
Our contact email address.
We can provide a specialist, tailored health and medical news service for your site.
Click here for more information
RSS graphic XML Graphic Add to Google
About Englemed news services - services and policies.
Englemed News Blog - Ten years and counting.
Diary of a reluctant allergy sufferer - How the British National Health Service deals with allergy.
BookshopFor books on women's health, healthy eating ideas, mental health issues, diabetes, etc click here
Copyright Notice. All reports, text and layout copyright Englemed Ltd, 52 Perry Avenue, Birmingham UK B42 2NE. Co Registered in England No 7053778 Some photos copyright Englemed Ltd, others may be used with permission of copyright owners.
Disclaimer: Englemed is a news service and does not provide health advice. Advice should be taken from a medical professional or appropriate health professional about any course of treatment or therapy.
India trial finds limited effectiveness from convalescent plasma
Fri October 23rd - Using convalescent plasma to treat moderately ill COVID-19 patients did not reduce severity of the illness or risk of death, according to the findings of a small clinical trial published today. More
On 08/02/2018 David Kelly wrote:
Would you like to write a piece about this to be i... on Researchers unveil new pain re...
On 23/10/2017 Cristina Pereira wrote: on HIV breakthrough - MRC...
On 12/09/2017 Aparna srikantam wrote:
Brilliant finding! indeed a break through in under... on Leprosy research breakthrough...
On 01/07/2017 Annetta wrote:
I have been diagnosed with COPD for over 12 years.... on Seaweed plan for antimicrobial...
On 12/03/2017 Steph wrote:
The photo you have paired with this article is its... on 'Fat shaming' limits...
guide to breast disorders guide to womb disorders guide to menopause Complete Women's Health: from The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists For books and family gift ideas click here
RSS graphic XML Graphic

Paediatrician call to step up breast-feeding

Monday February 1st, 2016

A senior paediatrician has urged the UK to step up breast-feeding levels after a global study found levels lower in rich countries than in poor ones.

Increasing breastfeeding to near-universal levels could save more than 800,000 children’s lives every year – equivalent to preventing 13% of all deaths among children under the age of two, a report in The Lancet claimed.

The largest and most detailed analysis to date that quantify levels, trends, and benefits of breastfeeding around the world, also found that if there was a significant increase in the number of women breastfeeding, it would prevent a further 20,000 breast cancer deaths every year.

Professor Russell Viner, of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said: “Britain has one of the lowest levels of breastfeeding compared to other rich countries - we worry that things will get much worse with Government’s proposed budget cuts.”

He added: “The benefits of breastfeeding have been widely publicised yet with today’s paper showing that just 1 in 5 children are breastfed in high income countries and 1 in 3 in low and middle income countries, it’s clear that efforts are still falling far too short and the grave reality is that this is costing children’s lives.

“At home in the UK we know that babies born to mothers living in poverty are less likely to be breastfed. We also know these families are at higher risk of mortality, are more likely to be admitted to hospital and have higher incidences of mental health problems.”

The two-part series, which analysed data from 28 systematic reviews and meta-analyses – 22 of which were commissioned specifically, found that one in five children in high-income countries is breastfed to 12 months of age, while one in three children in low and middle-income countries is exclusively breastfed for the first six months.

It means, say the authors, that millions of children are failing to receive the full benefits provided by breastfeeding, which is one of the most effective preventive health measures for children and mothers but it is still overlooked as a critical need for population health.

Series author Professor Cesar Victora, from the Federal University of Pelotas in Brazil, said: “There is a widespread misconception that the benefits of breastfeeding only relate to poor countries. Nothing could be further from the truth.

“Our work for this Series clearly shows that breastfeeding saves lives and money in all countries, rich and poor alike. Therefore, the importance of tackling the issue globally is greater than ever.”

According to the study, breastfeeding reduces the risk of sudden infant deaths (SIDS) by more than one third in high income countries, while in low-and middle-income countries it can help to prevent about half of all diarrhoea episodes and one third of respiratory infections.

The investigation also revealed a strong economic case for investment in promoting breastfeeding.

Boosting breastfeeding rates for babies under six months to 90% in the USA, China, and Brazil, and to 45% in the UK, would cut treatment costs of common childhood illnesses. The authors estimate that it would save healthcare systems at least $2.45 US billion in the USA, $29.5 US million in the UK, $223.6 US million in China, and $6.0 US million in Brazil.

“Breastfeeding is one of the few positive health behaviours that is more common in poor than richer countries, and within poor countries, is more frequent among poor mothers,” said Prof Victora.

“The stark reality is that in the absence of breastfeeding, the rich-poor gap in child survival would be even wider. Our findings should reassure policymakers that a rapid return on investment is realistic and feasible, and won’t need a generation to be realised.”

The authors call for political commitment and financial investment to protect, promote, and support breastfeeding at all levels, while more needs to be done to regulate the breastmilk-substitute industry.

“There is a widespread misconception that breastmilk can be replaced with artificial products without detrimental consequences,” said Prof Victora.

“The evidence outlined in the Series, contributed by some of the leading experts in the field, leaves no doubt that the decision not to breastfeed has major long-term negative effects on the health, nutrition and development of children and on women’s health.”

Victora C, Bahl R, Barros A et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 2016; 387: 475–90.

Rollins N, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. 2016; 387: 491–504.

Tags: Child Health | Childbirth and Pregnancy | Nursing & Midwifery | UK News | Women's Health & Gynaecology

Printer friendly page Printer friendly page

Comment on this article:

<a>,<b> & <p> tags allowed
Please enter the letters displayed:
(not case sensitive)