NEWS NAVIGATOR
Englemed logo
SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!
Sign up for Englemed updates from TwitterSign up for Englemed updates from Facebook
BOOKS AND GIFTS THIS WAY!
BookshopFor books on women's health, healthy eating ideas, mental health issues, diabetes, etc click here
SEARCH THIS SITE
ENGLEMED
Contact Englemed
Send an e-mail with your comments!
We can provide a specialist, tailored health and medical news service for your site.
Click here for more information
RSS graphic XML Graphic Add to Google
About Englemed news services - services and policies.
Englemed News Blog - Ten years and counting.
Diary of a reluctant allergy sufferer - How the British National Health Service deals with allergy.
Copyright Notice. All reports, text and layout copyright Englemed Ltd, 52 Perry Avenue, Birmingham UK B42 2NE. Co Registered in England No 7053778 Some photos copyright Englemed Ltd, others may be used with permission of copyright owners.
Disclaimer: Englemed is a news service and does not provide health advice. Advice should be taken from a medical professional or appropriate health professional about any course of treatment or therapy.
FreeDigitalPhotos
www.freedigitalphotos.net
FreeWebPhotos
www.freewebphoto.com
TODAY'S NEWS
Day-time abstention may help combat obesity
Fri May 18th - Regular eating times and fasting for a number of hours a day might prove to be beneficial to our health, a US study has claimed. More
Conflict over diet advice for pregnant women
Fri May 18th - Pregnant women can reduce the risk of developing serious complications by following a calorie controlled diet, researchers say today. More
Athlete pain tolerance could aid treatment
Fri May 18th - Athletes’ ability to tolerate pain for longer than non-athletes could give pain management specialists new ways of treating patients, researchers reported yesterday. More
RECENT COMMENTS
On 11/05/2012 Anonymous wrote:
In fact the biggest risk is the patch and the ring - Read more

On 10/05/2012 Editor wrote:
Welcome to Englemed comments. We'd like your view - Read more

BOOKS ON WOMEN'S HEALTH
guide to breast disorders guide to womb disorders guide to menopause Complete Women's Health: from The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists For more books and family gift ideas click here
OTHER NEWS OF INTEREST
WOMEN'S HEALTH NEWS FEED
RSS graphic XML Graphic
ENGLEMED HEALTH NEWS

Birth choice urged as study shows "safe" pregnancies

Friday November 25th, 2011

Women with straightforward pregnancies should be allowed to choose where they give birth - but this may not apply to first pregnancies, according to a landmark British study published today.

First-time mothers who opt for a home birth have a increased risk of medical problems, according to the research. Even so, the overall risk is low in all birth settings, at 4.3 serious complications per 1,000 births, the researchers say.

The University of Oxford study also found there were no significant differences in the odds of an adverse outcome for any of the non-obstetric unit settings compared with obstetric units.

The results should “support a policy of offering women with low risk pregnancies a choice of birth setting” and should enable women and their partners to have informed discussions with health professionals about planned place of birth, say the authors.

The team, led by Professor Peter Brocklehurst for the Birthplace in England Collaborative Group, studied almost 65,000 low risk pregnancies, including nearly 17,000 planned home births and 28,000 planned midwifery unit births, between April 2008 and April 2010.

They compared perinatal outcomes and interventions in labour by planned place of birth – home, freestanding midwifery units, midwife-led units on a hospital site with obstetric services, and obstetric units – across all NHS trusts in England.

For women giving birth for the first time, the risk of an adverse outcome, such as stillbirth after start of care in labour, early neonatal death, brain injury and injuries to the upper arm or shoulder during birth, was 9.3 per 1,000 births for planned home births compared with obstetric units.

But for women who had given birth before, there were no significant differences in the rate of adverse outcomes between birth settings.

Interventions during labour, such as epidural, forceps delivery or caesarean section, were substantially lower in all non-obstetric unit settings.

Transfers to hospital from other birthplaces were frequent, particularly among first-time mothers where between 36 per cent and 45 per cent of mothers are transferred during labour or immediately after the birth.

“These results will enable women and their partners to have informed discussions with health professionals in relation to clinical outcomes and planned place of birth,” say the authors, writing in the British Medical Journal.

Cathy Warwick, chief executive and general secretary of the Royal College of Midwives, called for a "seismic shift" in the way birth services are organised.

She said: “The RCM hopes that its findings will be widely used and will help health professionals support women to make informed choices about their options when considering where to give birth. It should also influence the planning of high-quality maternity services across the UK and internationally.”

But the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists warned of the risks faced by first-time mothers - pointing out that more than a third of these women would need transfer from freestanding units to specialist centres.

President Tony Falconer said midwifery units could still be expanded to care for women who have already given birth once without complications.

He said: "This study identified the need for further work on the adverse outcomes of home birth for first-time mothers and to examine why intervention rates are higher in obstetric units."

Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. Birthplace in England Collaborative Group. British Medical Journal. November 25 2011;343:d7400 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d740.

Tags: Childbirth and Pregnancy | NHS | Nursing & Midwifery | UK News | Women’s Health & Gynaecology

Printer friendly page Printer friendly page

CATEGORIES