NEWS NAVIGATOR
Englemed logo
SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!
Sign up for Englemed updates from TwitterSign up for Englemed updates from Facebook
BOOKS AND GIFTS THIS WAY!
BookshopFor books on women's health, healthy eating ideas, mental health issues, diabetes, etc click here
SEARCH THIS SITE
ENGLEMED
Contact Englemed
Send an e-mail with your comments!
We can provide a specialist, tailored health and medical news service for your site.
Click here for more information
RSS graphic XML Graphic Add to Google
About Englemed news services - services and policies.
Englemed News Blog - Ten years and counting.
Diary of a reluctant allergy sufferer - How the British National Health Service deals with allergy.
Copyright Notice. All reports, text and layout copyright Englemed Ltd, 52 Perry Avenue, Birmingham UK B42 2NE. Co Registered in England No 7053778 Some photos copyright Englemed Ltd, others may be used with permission of copyright owners.
Disclaimer: Englemed is a news service and does not provide health advice. Advice should be taken from a medical professional or appropriate health professional about any course of treatment or therapy.
FreeDigitalPhotos
www.freedigitalphotos.net
FreeWebPhotos
www.freewebphoto.com
TODAY'S NEWS
Day-time abstention may help combat obesity
Fri May 18th - Regular eating times and fasting for a number of hours a day might prove to be beneficial to our health, a US study has claimed. More
Conflict over diet advice for pregnant women
Fri May 18th - Pregnant women can reduce the risk of developing serious complications by following a calorie controlled diet, researchers say today. More
Athlete pain tolerance could aid treatment
Fri May 18th - Athletes’ ability to tolerate pain for longer than non-athletes could give pain management specialists new ways of treating patients, researchers reported yesterday. More
RECENT COMMENTS
On 11/05/2012 Anonymous wrote:
In fact the biggest risk is the patch and the ring - Read more

On 10/05/2012 Editor wrote:
Welcome to Englemed comments. We'd like your view - Read more

THIS WEEK'S STORIES
New heart medicine drive
Thurs May 17th - People with high cholesterol are being encouraged to take their medicines today as research highlighted the benefits of the medicines. More
Nine new breast cancer genes
Thurs May 17th - Nine new genes have been found linked to breast cancer, British scientists revealed last night. More
Poor food tax plan probed
Wed May 16th - Fatty foods would need a "fat tax" of at least 20 per cent to make a significant difference to the way Britons eat, experts warn today. More
Extra time drug u-turn
Wed May 16th - British regulators today performed a u-turn over a controversial drug - which campaigners say can give men with prostate cancer quality "extra time". More
ENGLEMED HEALTH NEWS

UK sunscreen advice "blunder"

Wednesday June 1st, 2011

The official advice that Britons are getting on sunscreen does not go far enough, experts alleged today.

Recent guidance from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) says that, used properly, a sunscreen with a sun protection factor (SPF) of at least 15 is enough to prevent sunburn during all-day exposure to tropical sunshine.

But an editorial in the Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin states that this recommendation is "not in the interests of public health." It says that, in reality, people using sunscreens typically apply much less than is used in the manufacturer's tests, and get no more than half, at best, of the protection indicated on the label.

The editorial says that applying sunscreen as thickly as recommended is "almost impossible", as it runs off the skin. It would also be expensive, requiring a standard 200ml bottle of sunscreen every two to three days.

However, products labelled with an SPF of 30, plus a 4- or 5-star UVA rating, "would more reliably deliver adequate sun protection" and be sufficient under most circumstances. "We believe that this is what NICE should have recommended," the editorial states.

It also advises sunscreen users to spread sunscreen evenly, re-apply after swimming or heavy sweating, and not to use sunscreen to prolong time spent in the sun.

The authors add that the standard for testing sunscreens should be changed to accurately reflect how people use it in real life.

Journal editor, Dr Ike Iheanacho, commented: "NICE's recommendation to use sunscreens with an SPF as low as 15 is a blunder that overlooks the key evidence, and is not in the best interests of public health. This advice needs urgent review and correction."

But NICE today rejected the criticism.

Professor Mike Kelly, of NICE, said: "We felt it was important, in producing this guidance, to maintain a balance – recognising on the one hand the very real dangers of skin cancer, but also remembering on the other hand that we should not extrapolate from research carried out in much hotter, sunnier climates than our own.

We commissioned an expert report on the use of sunscreen in preventing skin cancer in England. According to this evidence, which was presented to the committee, SPF 15 should be sufficient as long as it is applied adequately."

Sunscreen SPFs: clear as daylight? Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, Vol. 49, June 2011.

Tags: Cancer | Dermatology | General Health | UK News

Printer friendly page Printer friendly page

CATEGORIES