NEWS NAVIGATOR
Englemed logo
SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!
Sign up for Englemed updates from TwitterSign up for Englemed updates from Facebook
BOOKS AND GIFTS THIS WAY!
BookshopFor books on women's health, healthy eating ideas, mental health issues, diabetes, etc click here
SEARCH THIS SITE
ENGLEMED
Contact Englemed
Send an e-mail with your comments!
We can provide a specialist, tailored health and medical news service for your site.
Click here for more information
RSS graphic XML Graphic Add to Google
About Englemed news services - services and policies.
Englemed News Blog - Ten years and counting.
Diary of a reluctant allergy sufferer - How the British National Health Service deals with allergy.
Copyright Notice. All reports, text and layout copyright Englemed Ltd, 52 Perry Avenue, Birmingham UK B42 2NE. Co Registered in England No 7053778 Some photos copyright Englemed Ltd, others may be used with permission of copyright owners.
Disclaimer: Englemed is a news service and does not provide health advice. Advice should be taken from a medical professional or appropriate health professional about any course of treatment or therapy.
FreeDigitalPhotos
www.freedigitalphotos.net
FreeWebPhotos
www.freewebphoto.com
TODAY'S NEWS
Cannabis doubles car crash risk
Fri February 10th - Cannabis users who drive within three hours of taking the drug are at double the risk of crashing than those who are not under the influence of alcohol or drugs, researchers said today. More
Planned caesarean carries lowest severe bleeding risk
Fri February 10th - Severe bleeding after giving birth is much less likely with a planned caesarean, Danish researchers have found. More
Travel Ideas
Travel Books and Maps
OTHER NEWS OF INTEREST
ENGLEMED HEALTH NEWS

WHO hits at swine flu critics

Friday June 11th, 2010

The world's most senior doctor has hit back at critics who have claimed conflicts of interest blighted the response to swine flu.

World Health Organisation director general Dr Margaret Chan has rejected the allegations in a letter to the British Medical Journal, which published them.

The BMJ criticised secrecy surrounding scientific advisers and WHO's emergency committee - showing that some advisers were linked to producers of drugs and vaccines.

In her letter Dr Chan said WHO had not "dismissed" critics and had set up an independent committee to review its actions.

She rejected suggestions that WHO had stoked up "unjustified fear".

She said: "The record is otherwise, and not a matter of interpretation. On 11 June 2009, when I announced the start of the pandemic, I drew attention to the fact that the worldwide number of deaths was small, and clearly stated that we did not expect to see a sudden and dramatic jump in the number of severe or fatal infections.

"In every assessment of the pandemic, WHO consistently reminded the public that the overwhelming majority of patients experienced mild symptoms and made a rapid and full recovery, even without medical treatment."

She repeated a promise that names of the emergency committee would be published once it finished its work - saying this had been to protect members from commercial pressure.

She writes: "Without question, the BMJ feature and editorial will leave many readers with the impression that WHO’s decision to declare a pandemic was at least partially influenced by a desire to boost the profits of the pharmaceutical industry.

"The bottom line, however, is that decisions to raise the level of pandemic alert were based on clearly defined virological and epidemiological criteria. It is hard to bend these criteria, no matter what the motive.

"Accusations that WHO changed its definition of a pandemic in order to accommodate a less severe event (and thus benefit industry) are not supported by the facts."

Yesterday WHO published a more detailed account of its actions during the epidemic.

Tags: Flu & Viruses | Respiratory | Traveller Health | World Health

Printer friendly page Printer friendly page

CATEGORIES